A real case from our practice: how a foreign beneficiary relocated from DMCC to Istanbul and then to İFM (Istanbul Financial Center), zeroing out corporate tax on an annual turnover of $25M.
Client Profile
- Foreign beneficiary (CIS)
- Trading company incorporated in Istanbul in 2023
- Prior to 2023: corporate structure in DMCC (Dubai)
- Reason for relocation: banking pressure on accounts of Russian and Kazakh beneficiaries, compliance hurdles, and surging maintenance costs of the UAE structure
Operating Model
- Procurement: China, India, Kazakhstan
- Sales: EU (Poland, Germany), North Africa (Egypt, Algeria), CIS
- Product: commodities and consumer goods
- Customs clearance in Türkiye: None; pure transit trade
"Before & After" Comparison
Costs and Transition Payback
Year-One Results
Key Critical Factors in the Case
“The primary risk was not the tax rates, but economic substance. Since 2023, the Turkish tax authority has been actively auditing the authenticity of operational functions—a paper-only registration in the zone without genuine staff and office operations does not work.”
“In this case, we structured the entity from day one with an office in İFM and 4 employees on Turkish employment contracts. This added ~$30K to OpEx, but shielded the 0% tax rate from reclassification.”
Comprehensive Jurisdiction Comparison: İFM vs DMCC vs Cyprus
Detailed guide for foreign traders: tax rates, substance requirements, entry costs, payback timelines, and a jurisdiction selection checklist.
⬇ Download PDF for FreeEnter your email and receive the PDF within one minute